A CHatGPT-Produced Description of the AP Gov Required US Supreme Court Cases

With twenty relevant MCQs, SAQs, and TF Questions

Peter Paccone

·

Follow

12 min read

·

Mar 10, 2023

--

Listen

Share

1. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): Facts: African American children were denied admission to certain public schools in Kansas because of their race. Constitutional principle: Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Decision: The Supreme Court held that segregation in public schools is inherently unequal and thus unconstitutional.
2. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969): Facts: Students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam War and were suspended. Constitutional principle: First Amendment right to free speech. Decision: The Supreme Court held that students do not lose their constitutional rights to freedom of speech when they enter a school, and that the school’s actions violated the First Amendment.
3. Marbury v. Madison (1803): Facts: William Marbury sued Secretary of State James Madison for not delivering his commission as a justice of the peace. Constitutional principle: Judicial review, the power of the Supreme Court to declare laws or executive actions unconstitutional. Decision: The Supreme Court held that the law in question was unconstitutional, and established the principle of judicial review.
4. Baker v. Carr (1962): Facts: Tennessee had not redrawn its legislative districts in over 60 years, resulting in significant population disparities among districts. Constitutional principle: Equal protection under the law and the “one person, one vote” principle. Decision: The Supreme Court held that the issue of legislative districting was a justiciable question, and that the district court should determine whether the state’s districting scheme violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
5. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): Facts: Maryland passed a law taxing the Second Bank of the United States, and James McCulloch, the bank’s cashier, refused to pay the tax. Constitutional principle: The “necessary and proper” clause of the Constitution and the Supremacy Clause. Decision: The Supreme Court held that the Constitution grants Congress implied powers to implement the powers explicitly granted by the Constitution, and that state actions that conflict with federal law are unconstitutional.
6. Citizens United v. FEC (2010): Facts: Citizens United, a non-profit organization, wanted to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton during the 2008 Democratic primary election. Constitutional principle: The First Amendment’s protection of free speech and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. Decision: The Supreme Court held that corporations and unions have the same First Amendment rights as individuals, and that the government cannot prohibit political spending by corporations or unions.
7. Schenck v. United States (1919): Facts: Schenck, a socialist, distributed anti-draft pamphlets during World War I and was convicted under the Espionage Act. Constitutional principle: The First Amendment’s protection of free speech, particularly during times of war. Decision: The Supreme Court held that the government can limit speech that poses a “clear and present danger” to national security, and that Schenck’s actions constituted such a danger.
8. Engel v. Vitale (1962): Facts: The Board of Regents of New York authorized a voluntary prayer for recitation at the start of each school day. Constitutional principle: The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing a religion. Decision: The Supreme Court held that the school-sponsored prayer was an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause.
9. Facts: Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for breaking and entering a pool hall in Florida in 1961. He could not afford a lawyer and requested that the court appoint one for him, but his request was denied. Gideon was forced to represent himself at trial and was subsequently convicted and sentenced to five years in prison. Clause: Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel Decision: The Supreme Court unanimously held that the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel applies to all criminal defendants in state courts, and that the state’s failure to appoint counsel for Gideon violated his right to a fair trial.
10. Shaw v. Reno Facts: In 1993, the state of North Carolina was required to redraw its congressional districts after the 1990 census. The state created a new majority-minority district, which was challenged by a group of white voters who argued that the district was created solely on the basis of race and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Clause: Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment Decision: The Supreme Court held that the creation of the majority-minority district was unconstitutional because it was created solely on the basis of race and did not serve a compelling state interest. This decision established the principle of “racial gerrymandering” and set limits on the use of race in redistricting.
11. US. v. Lopez Facts: In 1992, Alfonso Lopez Jr., a 12th-grade student, was caught carrying a gun in his high school in Texas. He was charged and convicted under a federal law that made it a crime to possess a firearm in a school zone. Clause: Commerce Clause of the US Constitution Decision: The Supreme Court held that the federal law under which Lopez was convicted was unconstitutional because it exceeded Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. This decision limited the scope of federal power and established that there are limits to Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce.
12. McDonald v. Chicago Facts: In 2008, Chicago resident Otis McDonald, a retired maintenance engineer, challenged the city’s ban on handguns. He argued that the ban violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms, which had been incorporated to the states through the 14th Amendment. Clause: Second Amendment of the US Constitution Decision: The Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms applies to the states and that the Chicago handgun ban was unconstitutional. This decision extended the individual right to bear arms to state and local governments and limited their ability to regulate gun ownership.
13. New York Times v. Sullivan Facts: In 1960, the New York Times published an advertisement in support of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. that contained several minor factual errors. L.B. Sullivan, a police commissioner in Montgomery, Alabama, sued the Times for defamation. Clause: First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech and of the press Decision: The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech and of the press requires a public official to prove actual malice in order to establish a claim of defamation. This decision strengthened the protections for the press and established a higher standard for public figures to prove defamation.
14. Wisconsin v. Yoder Facts: In 1972, three members of the Amish community in Wisconsin were charged with violating the state’s compulsory school attendance law. The Amish argued that attending school past eighth grade was contrary to their religious beliefs and way of life. Clause: First Amendment’s protection of free exercise of religion Decision: The Supreme Court held that the state’s compulsory school attendance law violated the First Amendment’s protection of free exercise of religion in this case. The Court found that the state’s interest in compulsory education was outweighed by the Amish community’s religious beliefs and way of life. This decision established a precedent for accommodating religious practices and beliefs, particularly in the area of education.

Twenthy Multiple Choice Questions

1. In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that: a. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies only to capital cases b. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to all criminal cases c. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not apply to state criminal cases d. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel only applies to defendants who cannot afford an attorney
2. Shaw v. Reno addressed the issue of: a. Equal protection under the law b. The scope of the Second Amendment c. Freedom of the press d. The balance of federal and state power
3. In US v. Lopez, the Supreme Court ruled that: a. The federal government has broad authority to regulate interstate commerce b. The Second Amendment only protects the right to bear arms in connection with military service c. States have broad authority to regulate firearms d. The federal government’s power to regulate commerce is not unlimited
4. McDonald v. Chicago addressed the issue of: a. Freedom of speech b. The scope of the Second Amendment c. Due process d. The right to counsel
5. In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that: a. The First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech is absolute b. Public figures must prove actual malice in order to recover damages for defamation c. The government can regulate speech that is critical of public officials d. The media can be held liable for defamation even if the statements made are true
6. Citizens United v. FEC addressed the issue of: a. The scope of the Second Amendment b. Equal protection under the law c. Campaign finance laws d. Religious freedom
7. In Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Supreme Court ruled that: a. Compulsory education laws violate the First Amendment’s protection of religious freedom b. Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their children c. States can require Amish children to attend public schools d. States can require all children to attend school until they reach a certain age
8. Which case addressed the issue of redistricting? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. McDonald v. Chicago
9. New York Times v. Sullivan addressed the issue of: a. Freedom of the press b. The right to a fair trial c. Due process d. Equal protection under the law
10. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that the federal government’s power to regulate interstate commerce is not unlimited? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. McDonald v. Chicago
11. Citizens United v. FEC addressed the issue of: a. Freedom of speech b. Due process c. The right to counsel d. Equal protection under the law
12. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that states can require parents to send their children to school until they reach a certain age? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. Wisconsin v. Yoder
13. McDonald v. Chicago addressed the issue of: a. Freedom of religion b. The scope of the Second Amendment c. Equal protection under the law
14. Which case addressed the issue of whether the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel applies to state criminal cases? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. McDonald v. Chicago
15. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that the federal government’s power to regulate campaign finance is limited by the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech? a. New York Times v. Sullivan b. Citizens United v. FEC c. Wisconsin v. Yoder d. None of the above.
16. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that states cannot use race as the primary factor in drawing legislative districts? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. McDonald v. Chicago
17. Which case addressed the issue of whether the Second Amendment applies to the states? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. McDonald v. Chicago
18. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of the press is essential to a functioning democracy? a. New York Times v. Sullivan b. Citizens United v. FEC c. Wisconsin v. Yoder d. None of the above.
19. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that Congress exceeded its power under the Commerce Clause by attempting to regulate guns in school zones? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. McDonald v. Chicago
20. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that parents have a constitutional right to direct the education of their children? a. Gideon v. Wainwright b. Shaw v. Reno c. US v. Lopez d. Wisconsin v. Yoder

Twenty Short Answer Questions

1. How did the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment in McDonald v. Chicago compare to its interpretation of the First Amendment in New York Times v. Sullivan?
2. How did the Supreme Court’s decisions in Gideon v. Wainwright and Shaw v. Reno address issues of equal protection under the law?
3. How did the Supreme Court’s rulings in Citizens United v. FEC and Wisconsin v. Yoder differ in their treatment of the balance between individual rights and government regulation?
4. How did the Supreme Court’s decision in US v. Lopez compare to its decision in New York Times v. Sullivan in their impact on the balance between individual rights and government regulation?
5. How did the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment in New York Times v. Sullivan compare to its interpretation of the First Amendment in Citizens United v. FEC?
6. In what ways did the Supreme Court’s rulings in Gideon v. Wainwright and Wisconsin v. Yoder address issues of the first amendment?
7. How did the Supreme Court’s decision in Shaw v. Reno compare to its decision in US v. Lopez in their impact on federalism and states’ rights?
8. How did the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment in McDonald v. Chicago compare to its interpretation of the First Amendment in New York Times v. Sullivan in their impact on individual rights?
9. In what ways did the Supreme Court’s rulings in Citizens United v. FEC and Wisconsin v. Yoder address issues of free speech?
10. How did the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment in New York Times v. Sullivan compare to its interpretation of the First Amendment in Citizens United v. FEC in their impact on the role of the media in American politics?
11. What was the main issue at stake in Gideon v. Wainwright, and how did the Supreme Court rule on this issue?
12. How did the Supreme Court’s decision in Wisconsin v. Yoder impact the relationship between religious freedom and compulsory education in the United States?
13. What was the primary argument made in US v. Lopez regarding federalism, and how did the Supreme Court rule on this issue?
14. How did the Supreme Court’s decision in Shaw v. Reno impact the redistricting process in the United States?
15. In what ways did the Supreme Court’s rulings in McDonald v. Chicago and Citizens United v. FEC address issues of individual rights?
16. How did the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment in New York Times v. Sullivan impact the role of the media in American politics?
17. How did the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC impact campaign finance laws in the United States?
18. What was the main argument made in McDonald v. Chicago regarding the scope of the Second Amendment, and how did the Supreme Court address this argument?
19. In what ways did the Supreme Court’s rulings in Gideon v. Wainwright and Wisconsin v. Yoder address issues of due process?
20. How did the Supreme Court’s decision in US v. Lopez impact the balance between federal and state power in the United States?

True/False Questions

1. True or False: In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the Supreme Court held that students do not have a First Amendment right to express political views in public schools.
2. True or False: Brown v. Board of Education held that separate educational facilities for black and white students are inherently unequal and violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
3. True or False: Marbury v. Madison established the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional.
4. True or False: Baker v. Carr held that redistricting of state legislative districts is a political question that cannot be reviewed by the courts.
5. True or False: McCulloch v. Maryland upheld the constitutionality of the National Bank and established the doctrine of implied powers.
6. True or False: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission held that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money in political campaigns because it is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment.
7. True or False: Schenck v. United States established the “clear and present danger” test for determining when speech can be restricted for national security reasons.
8. True or False: Engel v. Vitale held that state-sponsored prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
9. True or False: Gideon v. Wainwright established that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to criminal defendants in state courts.
10. True or False: Shaw v. Reno held that race cannot be the predominant factor in redistricting unless it is necessary to comply with the Voting Rights Act.
11. True or False: United States v. Lopez held that Congress exceeded its Commerce Clause powers by enacting a law prohibiting guns in school zones.
12. True or False: McDonald v. Chicago incorporated the Second Amendment and held that states cannot ban handguns for self-defense.
13. True or False: New York Times v. Sullivan held that public figures suing for libel must prove actual malice by the publisher.
14. True or False: In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the Supreme Court held that students have a First Amendment right to wear black armbands in school to protest the Vietnam War.
15. True or False: Brown v. Board of Education overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, which established the “separate but equal” doctrine for racial segregation.
16. True or False: Marbury v. Madison involved a dispute over the appointment of federal judges by President Thomas Jefferson.
17. True or False: Baker v. Carr held that state legislative districts must be drawn to ensure equal representation for all citizens.
18. True or False: McCulloch v. Maryland upheld a state law imposing a tax on the National Bank.
19. True or False: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission upheld the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibited corporations from making independent expenditures in political campaigns.
20. True or False: Engel v. Vitale involved a challenge to a state law requiring students to recite a prayer every day in public schools.
21. e: In Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Supreme Court held that the state’s compulsory school attendance law violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment when applied to Amish parents who refused to send their children to public schools beyond eighth grade.
22. True or False: Wisconsin v. Yoder involved a challenge to a state law requiring all children to attend school until the age of 16.